Citizens Fighting Eminent Domain Abuse
Against Censorship
For Privacy
|
|
Printer Friendly
Frank Gilmour - US Senate - Missouri - 2006 - Press Release
|
|
|
|
|
PRESS RELEASE
May 11, 2006
|
|
For
Immediate Release:
Libertarian Senate Candidate
Weighs in on Missouri Ballot Initiatives
St. Louis, MO – Frank Gilmour,
Libertarian candidate for the US Senate announced today that he, too,
has positions on the ballot initiatives that have been proposed for the
November ballot.
In news stories earlier this
week, Senator Jim Talent was reported to take a position on only one of
the six initiatives. His presumed Democratic opponent, Clair
McCaskill, was cited as taking positions on five of the
proposals. "They didn't ask me," said Frank Gilmour, who is
running unopposed in the Libertarian primary.
Gilmour would welcome the
opportunity to make his views known to the public. "Talent says
that these are State-level issues," noted Gilmour, "but telling the
public about our positions can help voters know who we are. For
me, these are pretty fundamental issues."
Gilmour's strongest views regard
the proposed constitutional amendment on stem cell research:
"Opponents of stem-cell research, including Jim Talent, bring up crazy
science-fiction horror stories to try to scare people." Gilmour notes
that the proposition forbids human cloning, and only allows research
that falls within Federal guidelines. "I would go further," he
says, "we need to look at relaxing the regulations at the Federal
level. When I see all the pain and suffering that could be
relieved by this research, I just can't believe that we are letting our
fears put limits on progress."
On the proposal to limit the
abuse of eminent domain, Gilmour distinguishes himself from McCaskill:
"She says that the legislation making its way through the State
Assembly is good enough. Well, it isn't. We need to have
meaningful reform that will stop local governments from taking peoples'
homes and businesses just to have them turned over to a
developer." Gilmour proposes a resolution by the U.S. Congress to
refute the Supreme Court's Kelo
decision.
On the other four potential
ballot proposals, Gilmour also has firm positions:
• Tobacco tax
increase: "The backers of this proposal say that the money will be used
for smoking education programs, but the State is already squandering
the money it receives from the lawsuit settlement with the tobacco
companies," notes Gilmour. "Besides, cigarette taxes are among
the most regressive taxes there are. I don't like tax increases
in general, and this one is no different."
• Government
spending cap: "I am in favor of any limit placed on government
spending. Politicians from the two main parties have shown us
that they will spend any tax money they can get their hands on.
We need to set some limits!"
• Minimum wage
increase: Gilmour notes that minimum wage laws tend to hurt the very
people they are intended to help. "Younger, inexperienced workers
are priced out of the market. How does that help them?"
• Medicaid
spending: "We need to honor the promises we have made to our seniors,"
says Gilmour. "But we also need to look at ways to keep spending
in check. The problems with our healthcare system can't be solved
by more government intervention, they are caused by too much government
involvement already."
Gilmour points out that his
positions
on these issues demonstrate that his candidacy represents a unique
opportunity for voters: "There is another
choice!"
#
# #
Contact Information for Frank Gilmour:
Website: http://gilmour2006.lpmo.org
Email: frankgilmour2006@yahoo.com
Cellphone:
(314) 602-1458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|